McCain, Obama, Abortion and Catholics


  By Sebastian Blackstone

McCain, Obama, Abortion and Catholics

This election season, Catholic issues have begun to take center stage. With Gov. Sarah Palin's strong stance on life, Nancy Pelosi's quotation of the doctors of the Church, Joe Biden's "private conviction on abortion, and the Catholic bishops unequivocal public statements, things are just heating up.

It is important to reflect on where candidates stand on the issues important to Catholics.There's a great comparison of John McCain and Barack Obama on the five non-negotiable issues for Catholics at eCatholicHub.net. They examine the candidates positions on abortion, euthanasia, embyronic stem-cell research, human cloning and homosexual "marriage.

First of all: abortion. Barack Obama has affirmed time and again his support for abortion and even infanticide, if his record in the Illinois State Senate is considered. Mr. Obama has stated that he does not considered unborn infants to be persons "entitled to the kinds of protections found in the Constitution. The National Association the Repeal Abortion Laws has stated they look forward to working with a "pro-choice Obama White House. John McCain, on the other hand has taken a pro-life stance on the abortion issue. In the 2000 primary campaign for president, he advocated changing the platform of the Republican party to insist on exceptions from an abortion ban for cases of rape and incest—which disagrees with Catholic teaching. But Mr. McCain has stated that Roe v. Wade ought to be overturned and famously, that life begins "at the moment of conception. John McCain has staked out for himself the pro-life real estate in America for the 2008 election, while Mr. Obama has done the opposite.

Second, euthanasia. Barack Obama stated that he regretted his vote to allow the family of Terri Schiavo to take their case to the federal courts to prevent her imminent death. He also stated that he thinks the state Oregon "did a service fo
r the country by passing a pro-assisted suicide referendum. Mr. Obama's position directly opposes the Catholic teaching that euthanasia or "mercy-killing is wrong in all cases. Mr. McCain also expressed regret about the way the Senate handled the Terri Schiavo case. However, he has yet to stake out a firm position on this issue.

Third, embryonic stem cell research. Both Mr. Obama and Mr. McCain voted "yes on Senate Bill 5, which provided federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. President Bush vetoed this bill. The Catholic Church has repeatedly issued teachings against embryonic stem cell research because it holds that human life begins at conception.Fourth, human cloning. Barack Obama co-sponsored a Senate Bill 1520 that would allow for human cloning of embryos, but would not allow the embryos to be maintained alive for more than 14 days. But John McCain has stated again and again that he is "strongly opposed to human cloning. McCain's view lines up with Church teaching on this issue.

Finally, homosexual "marriage. Barack Obama voted against the Marriage Protection Amendment and has stated that he would oppose any efforts banning gay marriage. John McCain stated his support for marriage between one man and one woman, yet he is open to allowing gay couples to enter into some type of civil unions or partnerships. The Catholic bishops in the United States have made many public statements that marriage between a man and a woman is the fundamental building block of society and ought not to be re-defined by political bodies.

After briefly noting each of these five important Catholic issues, neither Barack Obama nor John McCain shines as a "Catholic candidate. However, Obama's consistent opposition to Church teaching on every one of these issues make him less worthy of the Catholic vote. But John McCain will stand with Catholics in opposing abortion, euthanasia, human cloning and gay marriage. John McCain is the best choice of the two for American Catholics voting in 2008.For more information see http://johnmccainisprolife.com
Tags & Keywords :



Share this article:


Comments


#1 Posted by gabgabcortez@gmail.com - Oct 16, 2008, 2:33 am Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingemptyratingemptyratingempty Unrated

It seems your faith has made you lose your use of your brain since all decisions are already made for you bu your church. Do respect that each woman has exclusive rights to her own body as quaranteed by the constitution and the Roe vs. Wade case.




Posted by George (guest) - Nov 5, 2008, 6:30 pm

Why is someone's argument not valid because they base it upon their churches doctrines? I believe you have a right to your opinion but why must you insult those who disagree with you. If you wish to be strictly scientific you should know that a fetus is not a part of the human body. Study anatomy and you will find no where does it list a fetus as part of the human body.




lizlim

#2 Posted by lizlim - Oct 17, 2008, 2:19 pm Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingempty Unrated

you made a very good point here. The issue of abortion is a very huge issue and the voters must take this into consideration when voting for the right man. May the right man wins!




#3 Posted by an unknown user - Oct 27, 2008, 3:44 pm Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated

Very good work. This really helped me on one of my homework and research plans. Great Work.




#4 Posted by Sharon (guest) - Oct 29, 2008, 5:14 pm Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated

Excellent article. I'd like to know why a person that murders a pregnant woman has to answer for the killing of the mother and the child but when a pregnant woman decides the child is unwanted and aborts her own baby we refer to it as having the right to choose what happens to your own body......well, didn't the courts already decide that there are two bodies involved? How can you give the unborn rights in one case and not the other? Doesn't make much sense... does it?




#5 Posted by Kimyon (guest) - Nov 5, 2008, 4:59 pm Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingemptyratingemptyratingempty Unrated

What's good for the goose is NOT necessarily good for the gander.

What makes sense to one, doesn't make sense to another. That's just life. The article is what it is. Doesn't make it right, wrong, or excellent. It's just another opinion.




#6 Posted by Chris Olson (guest) - Nov 7, 2008, 9:54 am Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingempty Unrated

This is a topic I don't know how to feel about. but here are a couple of thoughts: If it's wrong to have an abortion then when is it wrong? At conception? Since premature babies can live, we know they are a person before they are born, but when? Jesus and John the baptist recognized each other from the womb when the two mothers met. I don't know how old they were. Then you have some wrong relationships in the Bible where the children from those were a lot of trouble. For example the Moabites who came from a daughter getting her father drunk because they had no one to carry on the family name. So I would not go so far as to say that life is so important that we dare to pass up any opportunity to create it, fun as that sounds. But I think life does start very very early, maybe at conception but we have no way to know. <a href="http://www.articlepoint.com">articlepoint</a>




joyce046

#7 Posted by joyce046 - Nov 14, 2008, 10:56 am Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingempty Unrated

You made some very good points, however those are your oppinions.




Carina

#8 Posted by Carina - Nov 21, 2008, 11:06 am Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated

I do not judge, I just think that you have your opinion and people must respect that. Great article




BridgettK

#9 Posted by BridgettK - Dec 27, 2008, 11:11 pm Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated

no offence to anyone. a fetus is part of the human body any real mother will tell you that. i do not care what religion you are. there are people who cannot have children and women who wish to not have their babies always have the option to give that child up for adoption. abortion is murder im sorry now but a fetus has a heartbeat, has a soul and playing god on who gets to be born and who does not get be born is wrong. great article




httpcharlotteb

#10 Posted by httpcharlotteb - Jan 4, 2009, 10:29 pm Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingemptyratingempty Unrated

You have the right to your opinion, but a fetus is part of the human body. It has a heartbeat. So life begins at conception.




Yukito

#11 Posted by Yukito - Feb 8, 2009, 4:08 am Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated

Nice work!




Fapturbo

#12 Posted by Fapturbo - Mar 23, 2009, 11:13 pm Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated

Excellent Article, keep up the work!




HabibS

#13 Posted by HabibS - Apr 10, 2009, 11:32 am Rating: ratingfullratingemptyratingemptyratingemptyratingempty Unrated

Useless!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




LakeyiaThompson

#14 Posted by LakeyiaThompson - Jul 12, 2009, 7:19 pm Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated

Great post




AliQuaklenbush

#15 Posted by AliQuaklenbush - Oct 24, 2009, 12:13 am Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingemptyratingempty Unrated

Over all there were accurate points made, however as I read the article I feel as if you are saying that "if you want to be a good catholic then you should vote for the guy who upholds some of our morals." Your religion is your oppinion and your belief but voting for someone soely because they support your religious beliefs is a little unreasonable. When someone can not hold a stable conversation or even bear to repeat the same story consistanly then surely you must question his worthiness of your vote. also why is marriage in quotations? Even if you fail to agree with the union the piece of paper ( which is the only difference between legal marriage and a nonlegally recognized relationship) is the same,therefore it is a marriage. No quotation marks needed, it is what it is. Hold strong to your oppinions and stand your ground but realize that just because someone hold your religious veiws doesn't mean that they are fit to run a country or protect the freedom you have to voice your oppinion.




leylucs

#16 Posted by leylucs - Dec 28, 2009, 9:33 pm Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingemptyratingempty Unrated

nice work!




#17 Posted by Patricia (guest) - Feb 17, 2010, 11:11 am Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated

First of all I wish I had the benefit of reading this informative article before I helped to elect President Baraka Obama into the oval office. I am African-American and one of my primary reasons for voting for Mr. Obama was that we shared a some what similar racial heritage. Another consideration was that perhaps a person who had experienced the unfair deferential treatment African-Americans so often receive in America would bring these injustices to the moral conscience of American society; right many of these wrongs; and initiate the creation of a societal demolition club that would diligently work towards destroying the prestigious wall of segregation that still transparently exist. I possess a tremendous belief that our recently elected president will in fact help America in this respect.
Even though the above will hopefully take place, I have to humbly agree with the author of this article. It is extremely important to elect individuals who will purse and establish societal rules, laws and standards that agree and align themselves with that of your own. Otherwise what is the point of supporting and placing someone in such a powerful and nation altering position if you do not see eye to eye on most issues. You are effectively saying to your candidate and the rest of the world, this individual represents and agrees with my personal standards. You are also suggesting that you back and give lend your support to your elected official who will work diligently toward initiating and bring into being my personally approved perspectives, for the betterment of myself, my family, my country and the world.
So from this perspective I write my comments today and my sincere intent is this, that my open acknowledgement of a fundamental mistake in voting ethically rather than thinking beyond those parameters and viewing my actions from a human standpoint.
I've learned a valuable lesson from this discussion. Hopefully you have too.




#18 Posted by Christina (guest) - Feb 25, 2010, 10:37 am Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingempty Unrated

You made some interesting points. Good job.





How would you rate the quality of this article?
Rating: * Poor Excellent
Vote on this Article and Earn 3 Points
Your Name:
Your Email:
Your Comment: *
Comment on this Article and Earn 12 Points.
Verification * img0img1img2img3img4img5

Please copy the characters from the image above into the text field below. Doing this helps us prevent automated submissions.
 

Search:

 

Article Options

 
   

Categories

 
 

Popular Authors

 

Popular Articles

 

Recent Blogs